
The Critical Thinking Rubric
1) Identifies and summarizes the problem/question at issue (and/or the source's position).
Limited Development |
Substantially Developed

|
Does not identify and summarize the problem, is confused or identifies a different and inappropriate problem. |
Identifies the main problem and subsidiary, embedded, or implicit aspects of the problem, and identifies them clearly, addressing their relationships to each other. |
Does not identify or is confused by the issue, or represents the issue inaccurately. |
Identifies not only the basics of the issue, but recognizes nuances of the issue. |
2) Identifies and presents the STUDENT'S OWN perspective and position as it is important to the analysis of the issue.
Limited Development |
Substantially Developed

|
Addresses a single source or view of the argument and fails to clarify the established or presented position relative to one's own. Fails to establish other critical distinctions. |
Identifies, appropriately, one's own position on the issue, drawing support from experience, and information not available from assigned sources. |
3) Identifies and considers OTHER salient perspectives and positions that are important to the analysis of the issue.
Limited Development |
Substantially Developed

|
Deals only with a single perspective and fails to discuss other possible perspectives, especially those salient to the issue. |
Addresses perspectives noted previously, and additional diverse perspectives drawn from outside information. |
4) Identifies and assesses the key assumptions.
Limited Development |
Substantially Developed

|
Does not surface the assumptions and ethical issues that underlie the issue, or does so superficially. |
Identifies and questions the validity of the assumptions and addresses the ethical dimensions that underlie the issue. |
5) Identifies and assesses the quality of supporting data/evidence and provides additional data/evidence related to the issue.
Limited Development |
Substantially Developed

|
Merely repeats information provided, taking it as truth, or denies evidence without adequate justification. Confuses associations and correlations with cause and effect. |
Examines the evidence and source of evidence; questions its accuracy, precision, relevance, completeness.
Observes cause and effect and addresses existing or potential consequences. |
Does not distinguish between fact, opinion, and value judgments. |
Clearly distinguishes between fact, opinion, & acknowledges value judgments. |
|